
Microsoft and CrowdStrike announced a joint initiative to create a unified reference system for tracking nation-state hacking groups across different cybersecurity platforms. The partnership aims to reduce confusion caused by competing naming conventions while preserving each company’s proprietary threat intelligence methodologies1.
Standardization Without Uniformity
The new system will map aliases between Microsoft’s weather-themed names (e.g., “Lemon Sandstorm”) and CrowdStrike’s animal-based nomenclature (e.g., “Fancy Bear”) without forcing either company to abandon their existing frameworks. This approach addresses a long-standing pain point for security teams who must reconcile different vendor labels for the same threat actors2.
For example, the Russian group known as APT29 appears as “Cozy Bear” in CrowdStrike reports and “Nobelium” in Microsoft advisories. The Iranian group “Phosphorus” has at least eight aliases including “Magic Hound” and “TA453” across various platforms. The new reference system will automatically link these names in security alerts and reports3.
Industry Challenges and Criticism
The cybersecurity industry has struggled with inconsistent naming conventions for years. Palo Alto and Google have also participated in standardization efforts, but commercial competition has hindered progress. SentinelOne publicly dismissed the initiative as “branding-marketing-fairy dust,” reflecting skepticism about vendors collaborating effectively4.
Technical challenges include overlapping attributions where multiple vendors assign different names to the same activity clusters. The MITRE ATT&CK database has attempted to map these aliases, but the process remains manual and incomplete. The Microsoft-CrowdStrike partnership represents the first automated cross-platform solution5.
Operational Impact on Security Teams
For security operations centers, the naming confusion creates tangible risks. A 2024 survey found that 68% of analysts wasted significant time reconciling threat reports due to naming inconsistencies. The new reference system will integrate with SIEM platforms to automatically normalize group names in alerts and dashboards6.
The table below shows how the system maps aliases for three high-profile groups:
Common Attribution | Microsoft Name | CrowdStrike Name | Other Aliases |
---|---|---|---|
Russian Foreign Intelligence | Forest Blizzard | Fancy Bear | APT29, Cozy Bear, Nobelium |
Chinese PLA Unit 61419 | Volt Typhoon | Vixen Panda | APT41, Bronze Atlas |
Iranian Revolutionary Guard | Mint Sandstorm | Charming Kitten | Phosphorus, TA453, Magic Hound |
Implementation and Future Developments
The reference system will debut in June 2025 as a public glossary updated quarterly. Both companies will maintain their internal naming conventions while publishing cross-reference tables through their threat intelligence APIs. Future versions may incorporate naming schemes from additional vendors7.
Security teams should prepare for the change by:
- Updating SIEM correlation rules to recognize all mapped aliases
- Reviewing historical reports to identify groups affected by naming changes
- Training analysts on the new reference materials
The initiative comes as CrowdStrike faces scrutiny following a 2024 global outage caused by a faulty update to its Falcon platform. Some analysts question whether naming standardization distracts from more pressing security challenges8.
Conclusion
The Microsoft-CrowdStrike partnership represents a pragmatic compromise in the long-running debate over threat actor naming conventions. While not eliminating proprietary naming systems, the automated alias mapping should reduce confusion for defenders tracking advanced persistent threats across multiple intelligence sources. The success of the initiative will depend on widespread adoption and continued maintenance as threat groups evolve their tactics.
References
- “Forest Blizzard vs Fancy Bear: Cyber companies hope to untangle weird hacker names,” Reuters, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/forest-blizzard-vs-fancy-bear-cyber-companies-hope-untangle-weird-hacker-2025-06-02
- “Threat actor names proliferate, adding confusion,” Dark Reading, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.darkreading.com/threat-intelligence/threat-actor-names-proliferate-adding-confusion
- “Understanding threat actor naming conventions,” Infosecurity Europe, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.infosecurityeurope.com/en-gb/blog/threat-vectors/understanding-threat-actor-naming-conventions.html
- “Forest Blizzard vs Fancy Bear,” AOL News, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.aol.com/news/forest-blizzard-vs-fancy-bear-162127208.html
- “What is CrowdStrike and how is it linked to Microsoft outage,” Times of India, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/what-is-crowdstrike-and-how-is-it-linked-to-microsoft-outage/articleshow/111862845.cms
- “What is CrowdStrike? Global Microsoft outage explained,” CBS News, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-is-crowdstrike-global-microsoft-outage
- “Anonymous Sudan hacktivist group DDoS indictment,” CrowdStrike Blog, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/blog/anonymous-sudan-hacktivist-group-ddos-indictment
- “Salt Typhoon believed to be behind Commvault data breach,” GovInfoSecurity, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.govinfosecurity.com/salt-typhoon-believed-to-be-behind-commvault-data-breach-a-28496