
A threat actor known as **Hazy Hawk** has been actively exploiting DNS misconfigurations to hijack abandoned cloud endpoints belonging to trusted organizations. These compromised domains are then weaponized for large-scale scam delivery and traffic distribution systems (TDS). The group’s tactics involve **CNAME hijacking**, a technique that redirects legitimate traffic to malicious infrastructure, often for phishing, malware distribution, or credential harvesting[1].
**TL;DR**
– **Threat Actor**: Hazy Hawk, linked to Eastern European cybercriminal groups.
– **Technique**: Exploits **DNS misconfigurations (lame delegation)** to hijack abandoned cloud endpoints via CNAME records.
– **Impact**: Over **1 million domains** are vulnerable to similar attacks, per recent research[2].
– **Mitigation**: Regular DNS audits, stale record removal, and provider-level fixes (e.g., randomized name server assignments).
### **How Hazy Hawk Operates**
Hazy Hawk targets subdomains with **geolocation-based redirection**, allowing them to evade detection by regional security measures. The group hijacks abandoned cloud endpoints (e.g., CDC, Deloitte) by exploiting **CNAME records** that point to defunct or unmaintained infrastructure[3]. Once control is established, the domains are repurposed for:
– **Phishing campaigns** mimicking trusted brands.
– **Malware distribution** via fake software updates.
– **Traffic redirection** to exploit kits or scam pages.
Recent findings from **Infoblox** highlight that Hazy Hawk shares infrastructure with other DNS predators like **Vacant Viper** and **Horrid Hawk**, suggesting a broader ecosystem of abuse[4].
### **Technical Breakdown: DNS CNAME Hijacking**
The attack relies on **lame delegation**, where DNS records point to non-responsive or abandoned name servers. Attackers identify these misconfigured domains and register the abandoned cloud endpoints (e.g., AWS S3 buckets, Azure Blob Storage) to take control of the CNAME chain.
**Example Attack Flow**:
1. **Reconnaissance**: Scans for domains with misconfigured CNAME records.
2. **Registration**: Claims the abandoned cloud resource (e.g., `legacy-subdomain.victim.com` → `defunct-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com`).
3. **Weaponization**: Hosts malicious content or redirects to attacker-controlled infrastructure.
A **BleepingComputer** report notes that Hazy Hawk frequently targets organizations with legacy cloud deployments, where DNS hygiene is often neglected[5].
### **Mitigation and Best Practices**
To defend against CNAME hijacking:
– **Audit DNS records**: Identify and remove stale or unused CNAME entries.
– **Monitor cloud endpoints**: Ensure all active subdomains resolve to maintained resources.
– **Implement DNSSEC**: Prevents unauthorized DNS modifications.
– **Provider-level fixes**: Cloud providers like AWS and Azure now offer **randomized bucket names** to reduce hijacking risks[6].
### **Relevance to Security Teams**
– **Red Teams**: Simulate CNAME hijacking to test detection capabilities.
– **Blue Teams**: Deploy anomaly detection for unexpected DNS changes.
– **Threat Intel**: Track IOCs (e.g., known Hazy Hawk C2 IPs) via feeds like **Infoblox Threat Intelligence**[7].
### **Conclusion**
Hazy Hawk’s exploitation of DNS misconfigurations underscores the need for proactive DNS management. With over 1 million domains exposed to similar risks, organizations must prioritize DNS hygiene to prevent collateral damage from hijacked trusted domains.
**References**
- “Hazy Hawk gang exploits DNS misconfigs to hijack trusted domains,” BleepingComputer, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hazy-hawk-gang-exploits-dns-misconfigs-to-hijack-trusted-domains.
- “Sitting Ducks Attack Technique,” Security Affairs, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://securityaffairs.com/166445/hacking/sitting-ducks-attack-technique.html.
- “DNS Predators Hijack Domains to Supply Their Attack Infrastructure,” Infoblox, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://blogs.infoblox.com/threat-intelligence/dns-predators-hijack-domains.
- “New Sitting Ducks DNS Attack Allows Threat Actors to Takeover Domains,” Varutra, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.varutra.com/ctp/threatpost/postDetails/New-Sitting-Ducks-DNS-Attack.
- “Operation Moonlander Dismantled the Botnet Behind Anyproxy and 5socks,” Security Affairs, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://securityaffairs.com/177664/malware/operation-moonlander.
- “Help Net Security: Sitting Ducks Attack,” Help Net Security, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2024/11/15/sitting-ducks-attack.
- “Infoblox Threat Intelligence Reports,” Infoblox, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://blogs.infoblox.com/threat-intelligence.